traffichaa.blogg.se - Exchange ironport mx

Arc-authentication-results: i=2 mx. dkim=pass header.s=iport header.b=NaocZ+Z3 dkim=pass header.s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com header.b=XsBPR3Zn arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain= dkim=pass dkdomain= dmarc=pass fromdomain=) spf=pass (: domain of designates 173.37.86.80 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom= Arc-authentication-results: i=1 mx. 1 spf=pass smtp.mailfrom= dmarc=pass action=none om= dkim=pass header.d= arc=none.

To: Subject: Re: 12/15 Ad Hoc - CANCELLED.

But things may change.Re: 12/15 Ad Hoc - CANCELLED Thread Links It's not best of breed for email, compared to Microsoft's EDR product for example. Proofpoint is rolling this out as well (CLEAR)Ĭurrently ATP is immature, in my opinion. That being said, you do want the remediation features of say Cisco API-based which makes it easier to pull mails in retrospect.

The MX boxes of Proofpoint and Cisco works as your current Ironport VM - they are separately spun-up VMs with a dedicated IP you have more control over. you are going with Microsoft Online so what's with the cloud scare?Īnd how do you correlate threats? Secure X for example isn't really feasible without a cloud connection If you are paranoid over Cisco "getting all your emails" I take it you do not have Windows as the client OS' and that you. What does this even mean? Why spin up an "Ironport VM" if you can spin up the Cisco MX ESA? Or Cisco Secure Email api based. but we do look for simplicity whenever possible. Can't give away all our emails to Proofpoint, Mimecast or even Cisco Cloud.